<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Autopendium is not the ultimate old-car website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.autopendium.com/2007/07/04/why-autopendium-is-not-the-ultimate-old-car-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.autopendium.com/2007/07/04/why-autopendium-is-not-the-ultimate-old-car-website/</link>
	<description>A blog about a new website for people with old cars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:03:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: autopendium</title>
		<link>http://blog.autopendium.com/2007/07/04/why-autopendium-is-not-the-ultimate-old-car-website/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>autopendium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autopendium.com/2007/07/04/why-autopendium-is-not-the-ultimate-old-car-website/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I realise that -- which was why I worded my statement the way that I did :-) -- but I bet that in the next 12 months there will be some tweaks to it to make it even better, and you can&#039;t improve on perfection. 

Even if we can&#039;t see how it can be improved, you&#039;d hope that some people in Apple could.

Would love to try it for myself, but sadly us Brits aren&#039;t allowed it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realise that &#8212; which was why I worded my statement the way that I did <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8212; but I bet that in the next 12 months there will be some tweaks to it to make it even better, and you can&#8217;t improve on perfection. </p>
<p>Even if we can&#8217;t see how it can be improved, you&#8217;d hope that some people in Apple could.</p>
<p>Would love to try it for myself, but sadly us Brits aren&#8217;t allowed it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don MacAskill</title>
		<link>http://blog.autopendium.com/2007/07/04/why-autopendium-is-not-the-ultimate-old-car-website/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Don MacAskill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autopendium.com/2007/07/04/why-autopendium-is-not-the-ultimate-old-car-website/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I was very careful to say that the touch interface was perfect, not the phone.  And I still stand by that analysis.

The phone has flaws - no question, and I list many of them.  But the touch interface is perfect on a sub-human level.  

Try it for yourself and see.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very careful to say that the touch interface was perfect, not the phone.  And I still stand by that analysis.</p>
<p>The phone has flaws &#8211; no question, and I list many of them.  But the touch interface is perfect on a sub-human level.  </p>
<p>Try it for yourself and see.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
